35
35
May 27, 2014
05/14
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 35
favorite 0
quote 0
the second-year curriculum required accounting, administrative law, commercial law, constitutional law, corporations i, taxation, and trusts, although the course catalog contained the following generous exception: the law of international transactions and relations or labor law may be substituted for commercial law by second year students. isn't that nice? [laughter] those electing this substitution will normally be required to take commercial law in the third year. [laughter] even the third-year was not entirely elected. it said third-year students were required to take the course in property ii unless they have taken it previously. students who took any course in the second year in lieu of commercial law are required, in the absence of special permission, to take commercial law. now there was a faculty that had some firm views about what it took to become "learned in the law." contrast that curriculum with the current scene. it is something of an open secret now that the second and third years of school offer a student the chance to study whatever strikes his or her fancy, so long as
the second-year curriculum required accounting, administrative law, commercial law, constitutional law, corporations i, taxation, and trusts, although the course catalog contained the following generous exception: the law of international transactions and relations or labor law may be substituted for commercial law by second year students. isn't that nice? [laughter] those electing this substitution will normally be required to take commercial law in the third year. [laughter] even the...
45
45
Aug 1, 2017
08/17
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 45
favorite 0
quote 0
law fair. it used to be this obscure law log and now all of a sudden is at the center of american politics. if you don't know it, just google it and you'll see what i mean. during the bush administration he served as assistant attorney general in the office of legal counsel from 2003 to 2004. his publications include the book -- which i think is a model, sort of inside memory of how things work especially in regard to law in a presidential administration. and finally rosa brooks, someone who writes with as much wit as she does brilliance. she's professor of law at georgetown and also a senior fellow at the new american foundation and is most recently the author of "how everything became war and the military became everything." she served as counselor under secretary of defense for policy in the obama administration. and was awarded the medal for out standing service in 2011. okay, now is john witt. [ applause ] >> thank you, mary, for that really generous introduction. it's a real pleasure to b
law fair. it used to be this obscure law log and now all of a sudden is at the center of american politics. if you don't know it, just google it and you'll see what i mean. during the bush administration he served as assistant attorney general in the office of legal counsel from 2003 to 2004. his publications include the book -- which i think is a model, sort of inside memory of how things work especially in regard to law in a presidential administration. and finally rosa brooks, someone who...
22
22
Jul 16, 2017
07/17
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 22
favorite 0
quote 0
law crisis. so, we could think of the lwaw of structuring -- something like a emancipation. but there are essentially no lawyers in the executive branch in 1862. william whiting is running around saying he's a solicitor but no one is sure what that means. they have to reach out to a columbia professor to find somebody to write about code of war. there are no boots on the ground in the law domain and now there are. help explain in part why it looks different now. because their people there, standing behind, targeting officers who can offer advice and order things. it is not mean the law matters now and did not want before. >> i just want to say i completely agree with that. you read the supreme court decisions in the 19th-century during wartime, and you read the executive decisions and they are highly legalized about neutrality law. these were informing policy. and so my claim is not that this is something new. i think the bureaucratization and i think the extent of the legalization is, but i agre
law crisis. so, we could think of the lwaw of structuring -- something like a emancipation. but there are essentially no lawyers in the executive branch in 1862. william whiting is running around saying he's a solicitor but no one is sure what that means. they have to reach out to a columbia professor to find somebody to write about code of war. there are no boots on the ground in the law domain and now there are. help explain in part why it looks different now. because their people there,...
30
30
tv
eye 30
favorite 0
quote 0
laws on its own is it. well you make a quick point then why did the bar association did not support the trough national security legislation i championed back in 2 will of to try very hard to help hong kong to an act national security laws on our own why did they object to that and in the course of the public scrutiny i gave them many concessions now the awful trade you 3 imposes a constitutional duty on us to prohibit certain national security or france's but it does not preclude the p.r.c. of origins from acting under their constitution the problem with our parcels here is that it ignores the laws of china only focuses on the basic law of hong kong what should we really which sets out a constitutional arrangements for hong kong but the national people's congress is the highest of already in mainland china and the bar association has persisted in persistent in ignoring these realities so the national people's congress can just sweep aside the basic laws it feels like the bar association says it would appea
laws on its own is it. well you make a quick point then why did the bar association did not support the trough national security legislation i championed back in 2 will of to try very hard to help hong kong to an act national security laws on our own why did they object to that and in the course of the public scrutiny i gave them many concessions now the awful trade you 3 imposes a constitutional duty on us to prohibit certain national security or france's but it does not preclude the p.r.c. of...
41
41
Dec 4, 2014
12/14
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 41
favorite 0
quote 0
law. evening president obama's department of homeland security secretary jeh johnson has admitted to to the committee that there are limits to the power of prosecutorial discretion and that there comes a point when something amounts to a whole scale abandonment. the obama administration has crossed the line from any justifiable use of its authority to a clear violation of his constitutional responsibility to faithfully execute the laws. there is a difference between setting priorities, focusing more resources on those cases that seem more serious and setting enforcement free zones for millions of unlawful aliens. by boldly proclaiming that there will be no possibility of removal for millions of unlawful aliens, president obama eliminates entirely any deterrent effect our immigration laws have. al he states plainly that those laws can be ignored with impunity, such actions will encourage others to come here illegally, just like his action for childhood arrivals program encouraged tens of th
law. evening president obama's department of homeland security secretary jeh johnson has admitted to to the committee that there are limits to the power of prosecutorial discretion and that there comes a point when something amounts to a whole scale abandonment. the obama administration has crossed the line from any justifiable use of its authority to a clear violation of his constitutional responsibility to faithfully execute the laws. there is a difference between setting priorities, focusing...
57
57
Feb 23, 2014
02/14
by
ALJAZAM
tv
eye 57
favorite 0
quote 0
do you regret going to law profession. a law degree does not have to lead to traditional practice. anyone in government, journalist, teaching, politics could benefit for a j.d. but as we are finin finding out it aint ease. >> i do you regret going to law school? >> i don't regret the education or the license, subsidized my writing here got mere here wearing makeup. i do reget the debt. >> and it's huge for so many people. going to law school it used to be a great way to achieve upward mobility. but, you know, the school is extensive. hard work, promise i've high-paying job made it worth it. things are changing, though, in the last 25 years, tuition has risen twice as fast as inflation. and first year enrollment has plunged. making the future of the legal professional at least as we know it now, a bit uncertain. students are avoiding the career that has left many graduates saddled with huge debt, dwindling salaries and far job prospects, now justs are feeling the crunch about 80% of law schools are losing money and some universities are attempting to attract more students by selecti
do you regret going to law profession. a law degree does not have to lead to traditional practice. anyone in government, journalist, teaching, politics could benefit for a j.d. but as we are finin finding out it aint ease. >> i do you regret going to law school? >> i don't regret the education or the license, subsidized my writing here got mere here wearing makeup. i do reget the debt. >> and it's huge for so many people. going to law school it used to be a great way to...
1
1.0
May 4, 2023
05/23
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
and what is the law currently being considered about? during this period of time, we have gained experience that has shown some shortcomings in the mechanism that you and i adopted, the mechanisms were adopted for the first time, therefore certain mistakes were definitely made. well, for example, what do we offer to do in this draft law clarify in which cases and with regard to which information taxpayers can submit requests at the request of the state tax service clarify the grounds for carrying out non-payment documentary checks clarify that the legal or legal control of controlled foreign companies is determined on december 31 determine the specifics of taxation of income from transactions with valuable with the formation papers , we determine the definitions of the concepts of trust and fiduciary duty, and we determine the features of inclusion in the kick report of non-profit and charitable organizations. in this way, we take into account the technical points that business asks us about, that the tax authorities ask us about, which
and what is the law currently being considered about? during this period of time, we have gained experience that has shown some shortcomings in the mechanism that you and i adopted, the mechanisms were adopted for the first time, therefore certain mistakes were definitely made. well, for example, what do we offer to do in this draft law clarify in which cases and with regard to which information taxpayers can submit requests at the request of the state tax service clarify the grounds for...
0
0.0
Apr 29, 2022
04/22
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
a law. in addition, their the separation of powers argument proved too much because if it were right, and even if the attorney general were not the funding the law, we still wouldn't be allowed in. so that is what i would say. >> no, that's not what their point is. i think if the attorney general wasn't defending the law, there would be another case. that is with the court below said, it would be a different case if the attorney general refused to defend the law. but the logic your honor of their position, is that just isn't inherit executive power? >> but the problem with your position is that if north carolina's law said every member of the legislature has a right and must be made a party to defend the state or to defend the interest of the state, and then a federal court should be bound by 50, 100 legislators coming in and participation in the litigation. isn't that your point? >> no your honor that is not our point is that the first legislator if north carolina lost that any of the hundr
a law. in addition, their the separation of powers argument proved too much because if it were right, and even if the attorney general were not the funding the law, we still wouldn't be allowed in. so that is what i would say. >> no, that's not what their point is. i think if the attorney general wasn't defending the law, there would be another case. that is with the court below said, it would be a different case if the attorney general refused to defend the law. but the logic your honor...
74
74
Dec 12, 2017
12/17
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 74
favorite 0
quote 0
state law. when congress passed the statute, it had a report from the congressional budget office that specifically said this will have no budgetary impact on the federal government. >> can we interpret that as saying if you do regulate, then it will be printed? >> it may be preempted. as you know, congress may adapt a statute that expressly preempts or in some cases impliedly preempts state laws in aare inconsistent or way that obstructs the accompaniment of the federal -- >> is this your argument? don't just say yes. >> forget the airline act. it was a bad example. think about what you actually say is the federal government makes the determination of what interstate congress will be like in respect to this particular item. it can do that. -- ok, once it makes that determination, it can inconsistentlaws with that determination. that is called -- it cannot say that our determination is roughly that states can do it as they want but they cannot do it that way. for to do that is to tell the state
state law. when congress passed the statute, it had a report from the congressional budget office that specifically said this will have no budgetary impact on the federal government. >> can we interpret that as saying if you do regulate, then it will be printed? >> it may be preempted. as you know, congress may adapt a statute that expressly preempts or in some cases impliedly preempts state laws in aare inconsistent or way that obstructs the accompaniment of the federal -- >>...
90
90
Jan 2, 2018
01/18
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 90
favorite 0
quote 1
law. so what congress was saying there, and when congress passed the statute, it had a report from a congressional budget office that specifically said this will have no budgetary impact on the federal government. >> can we interpret that as saying if you do regulate, then it will be preempted? >> it may be preempted. congress, as you know, congress may adopt a statue that explicitly expressly preempts or in some cases impliedly preempts state laws that are inconsistent or in a way that obstructs the accomplishment of the federal objective. >> i'm seeing this, i think. is this your argument, and just don't say yes if it isn't. forget the airline dereg act. it was a bad example for this reason. i think what you actually say is the federal government makes a determination of what interstate commerce will be like in respect to this particular item. it can do that. including termination. it shouldn't be -- a determination. once it makes that determination, it can forbid state laws inconsistent
law. so what congress was saying there, and when congress passed the statute, it had a report from a congressional budget office that specifically said this will have no budgetary impact on the federal government. >> can we interpret that as saying if you do regulate, then it will be preempted? >> it may be preempted. congress, as you know, congress may adopt a statue that explicitly expressly preempts or in some cases impliedly preempts state laws that are inconsistent or in a way...
150
150
Jul 28, 2010
07/10
by
CNN
tv
eye 150
favorite 0
quote 0
this law would enforce federal law and therefore it's not in contradiction of federal law. it's in support of federal law. >> mr. horne, would you be opposed to what we do have now which is more time just to allow for a little more deliberations in court for something so important that will have an effect on this entire country? let's just deliberate a little more and get it to the supreme court and let them have the final say on this? >> for the judge to issue an injunction, she has to find merits by the plaintiff. i think that's a mistake because i think the law will not ultimately be thrown out. i think the law ultimately will be confirmed by the united states supreme court. and therefore, i don't think she had a basis to issue an injunction. >> you think she just made a bad call or she was citing for any political leanings? >> no, no, no. i'm not challenging her as an individual. i disagree with her ruling. i think this has been a law that supported federal law. it would show that a lot of people are having hysterical reactions that are unfounded. the law itself prohibi
this law would enforce federal law and therefore it's not in contradiction of federal law. it's in support of federal law. >> mr. horne, would you be opposed to what we do have now which is more time just to allow for a little more deliberations in court for something so important that will have an effect on this entire country? let's just deliberate a little more and get it to the supreme court and let them have the final say on this? >> for the judge to issue an injunction, she...
115
115
Mar 31, 2015
03/15
by
ALJAZAM
tv
eye 115
favorite 0
quote 0
>> it's because activists say this law goes further than those other laws. there's the issue of timing. this comes a year after the state was forced to allow same-sex marriage so a lot of people feel that the indiana law goes further than the other state laws and that times have changed and public opinion is shifting across the country and that the law simple was sending the wrong message they felt. >> jonathan he blamed the national press but the fact is have you the head of apple, tim cook who wrote an editorial in the "washington post" against the law almost as soon as it was passed. you have angie's list freezing a $40 million development project in indiana. is he saying all those business leaders misunderstood the intent of the law? >> he's certainly saying he's surprised by the reaction and backlash here and is standing by this law and saying a lot of people are taking it out of contest and that the only point of the law was to protect the religious liberties of people from being forced to do something that violated their religious beliefs. thank you v
>> it's because activists say this law goes further than those other laws. there's the issue of timing. this comes a year after the state was forced to allow same-sex marriage so a lot of people feel that the indiana law goes further than the other state laws and that times have changed and public opinion is shifting across the country and that the law simple was sending the wrong message they felt. >> jonathan he blamed the national press but the fact is have you the head of apple,...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
74
74
Mar 29, 2013
03/13
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 74
favorite 0
quote 0
and when i practiced law at the firm that had a library, many years ago, the older law books, the older case books were gotten weathered and i called it getting into a leather when you (inaudible) that it was relevant. the beauty of those cases that was decided before the turn of the last century is that in those days, the courts decided the case in a page or two. and nowadays, it is like 30 or 40 pages, if you can find one that is relevant it is good to say it. and the second thing that they had there was the directorry and i found my dad who practiced in new jersey many years ago back in 19933 edition, i use it for looking up judges and attorneys and the historical use of that is good too. >> good morning, my name is (inaudible) santacruise and i am here m my capacity as a sole practitioner and also the president of the san francisco lasada lawyers association and i am here to petition that you reconsider your current proposal and provide the san francisco law library adequate space. and i think that it is very obvious given how many people turned out today that it is a tremendous amo
and when i practiced law at the firm that had a library, many years ago, the older law books, the older case books were gotten weathered and i called it getting into a leather when you (inaudible) that it was relevant. the beauty of those cases that was decided before the turn of the last century is that in those days, the courts decided the case in a page or two. and nowadays, it is like 30 or 40 pages, if you can find one that is relevant it is good to say it. and the second thing that they...
1
1.0
Apr 29, 2021
04/21
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
existing laws. please whom would you not forget compassion for good people going through a difficult time. >> thank you. mr. horwitz? >> good afternoon chairman blumenthal, ranking member roos, and distinguished rivers of the committee. thank you for giving the opportunity for -- giving me the opportunity to testify on the importance of extreme protection laws. like you and so many others, i came to violence prevention because of my own loss. back then i did not have the knowledge or tools to intervene effectively. i wish i could go back in time, but i cannot and i cannot bring my friend back. what i can do, is what i'm doing now, encouraging policymakers like you to usual power and support lifesaving policy so that no other family or friend has to experience this type of heartbreak. gun violence remains high, taking 40,000 lives each year. 60% of those are suicide. extreme risk laws help prevent needful violence before it occurs have the potential to save many lives and are gaining traction through
existing laws. please whom would you not forget compassion for good people going through a difficult time. >> thank you. mr. horwitz? >> good afternoon chairman blumenthal, ranking member roos, and distinguished rivers of the committee. thank you for giving the opportunity for -- giving me the opportunity to testify on the importance of extreme protection laws. like you and so many others, i came to violence prevention because of my own loss. back then i did not have the knowledge...
0
0.0
Jul 16, 2022
07/22
by
KQED
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
we're going to get into the law and the details of the law. but first, what does this moment mean to you personally? >> my life changed on that day in december 2012. i will never forget it. there's lots of days i wish i could forget it. but i established a bond with those families. and weeks later, with families i met in hartford, new haven, that was angry that i was showing up, caring about this issue when 20 white children had died when black children die every day in my state. that bond is something i never had before in my professional career. and i made a commitment to them that i was not going to give up until we passed legislation that made it less likely that those shootings and murders would happen. and there were a lot of days during the last ten years, where i wasn't sure whether we would ever be able to break the back of the gun lobby. whether we would ever be strong enough to pass laws that would save the lives of kids in this country. so, to be on the senate floor, delivering the passage of a bill that will save lives, it means s
we're going to get into the law and the details of the law. but first, what does this moment mean to you personally? >> my life changed on that day in december 2012. i will never forget it. there's lots of days i wish i could forget it. but i established a bond with those families. and weeks later, with families i met in hartford, new haven, that was angry that i was showing up, caring about this issue when 20 white children had died when black children die every day in my state. that...
26
26
Apr 1, 2019
04/19
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 26
favorite 0
quote 0
law, a in turn created a red flag law, florida specific, to give law enforcement community a chance next time to intervene before it is too late. and the evidence about how these laws work is pretty impressive. we have some information here about florida specifically. in florida, broward county, 100 eight people were impacted including 28 cases where the person was accused of domestic violence, 45 from people suffering from mental illness and 34 people were committing suicide. there are multiple millions of people in florida and several hundred have been affected by this law and that is true pretty much all over the country. when you look at the people that have been affected, it is probably the best thing that could've happened to them and may have saved their lives and idr say it may have saved other people's lives. we are trying to balance the right to own a gun under the second amendment with mental health issues. that are far too prevalent in society and we do not have enough capability to deal with the problem and there are times like in the parkland case where the law enforcement
law, a in turn created a red flag law, florida specific, to give law enforcement community a chance next time to intervene before it is too late. and the evidence about how these laws work is pretty impressive. we have some information here about florida specifically. in florida, broward county, 100 eight people were impacted including 28 cases where the person was accused of domestic violence, 45 from people suffering from mental illness and 34 people were committing suicide. there are...
74
74
Dec 4, 2012
12/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 74
favorite 0
quote 0
what is the current law when it comes to law enforcement and e-mails and cell phones? >> guest: the short answer is that is confused and the longer answer is for e-mail that is less than 180 days old law enforcement need to warrant -- for e-mail more than 180 years old, it is just a subpoena, so there's no judicial intervention, no high standard of proof. for documents you store in the clouds, if you store something with google docs and come back and edit it, that is available with a subpoena. cell phones, there is no statutory provision about location information. so the courts have been in different places. some say if it is real-time location, for that they need a warrant. others say this gps location for that they need a warrant. there is not a clear rule yet for cell phone. >> host: what are the changes the judicial committee has approved? >> guest: they focus on content of communications. they said it should matter how will the content is. it shouldn't matter whether you stored it with this kind of a communication service provider or that one. for all of it there
what is the current law when it comes to law enforcement and e-mails and cell phones? >> guest: the short answer is that is confused and the longer answer is for e-mail that is less than 180 days old law enforcement need to warrant -- for e-mail more than 180 years old, it is just a subpoena, so there's no judicial intervention, no high standard of proof. for documents you store in the clouds, if you store something with google docs and come back and edit it, that is available with a...
131
131
Nov 4, 2013
11/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 131
favorite 0
quote 0
of law at the university of arizona college of law for writing the foreword to this book. as you know, this brilliant indigenous lawyer is currently serving as the u.n. special rubber on the rights of indigenous peoples at the united nations and in that capacity, the professor is who the u.n. official of the primarily responsible for interpreting this u.n. declaration and assisting nations around the world in implementing it. so i was and all of him when he agreed to write the foreword i knew that i had to do a good job. but what i would like to do in the book lecture this evening is to cover basically three areas with you. first i would like to look at y or explain why i wrote this book about the u.n. declaration. second, i would like to describe this u.n. declaration for you. who has read this declaration? raise your hand. by golly that is a pretty substantial fraction. but i want to briefly describe this a declaration, its principal features and the human rights framework that it creates for indigenous peoples not only around the world but here in the u.s.. and then thi
of law at the university of arizona college of law for writing the foreword to this book. as you know, this brilliant indigenous lawyer is currently serving as the u.n. special rubber on the rights of indigenous peoples at the united nations and in that capacity, the professor is who the u.n. official of the primarily responsible for interpreting this u.n. declaration and assisting nations around the world in implementing it. so i was and all of him when he agreed to write the foreword i knew...
20
20
Jun 12, 2020
06/20
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 20
favorite 0
quote 0
before that, there were no such laws other than a brief chicago law. i believe chicago enacted their law in 1908 but it didn't stay on the books very long. that law's really important because new york at that time was the epicenter of the united states in terms of population, new york city, i think cities number 50 to 100, if you take the 50 to 100th city at that time and you add them up, the populations, they still didn't equal new york city. that's how central new york was to the united states at that time. obviously they had a big fear. plus you've got to remember that the nra is organized chartered out of new york and that's where most of their members are and their headquarters is at. that's when they start talking about the second amendment, more so in passing than in depth though. >> on the auspices of the weapons crossing the borders. we had robert bareson in the 20th century, the mob violence and gang violence. how did that affect the debate in this country? >> well, there's an interesting thing about the mob. i think everybody in the united s
before that, there were no such laws other than a brief chicago law. i believe chicago enacted their law in 1908 but it didn't stay on the books very long. that law's really important because new york at that time was the epicenter of the united states in terms of population, new york city, i think cities number 50 to 100, if you take the 50 to 100th city at that time and you add them up, the populations, they still didn't equal new york city. that's how central new york was to the united...
0
0.0
Jul 2, 2023
07/23
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
well, the natural law explains why you do have laws. what do you do? have laws? i mean, a law restricts personal freedom. we say you should there should be justification for that. well, how do we get there? well, it's that logic of a moral judgment. if we say it's wrong for parenthood, tortures children for whom it's wrong for any parent. what's the logic of moral judgment? well, you come to that. this is what in aristotle we come to recognize that if it's wrong, actually wrong, wrong for anyone to do, we'd be warranted and forbidding that wrong to people generally are universally which is say forbidding it with a force of law. that's the extent that we're basing that question. that's laws at work. and of course we say that biped who conjugates verbs. why do we consider him a bear? right. we have to assume some rights are wrong. there must be standards for judging rights and wrongs. so it's a thing that i used to say that for the judge to get through the day without using natural law is like raising the question can i order the coffee without using syntax? it's a
well, the natural law explains why you do have laws. what do you do? have laws? i mean, a law restricts personal freedom. we say you should there should be justification for that. well, how do we get there? well, it's that logic of a moral judgment. if we say it's wrong for parenthood, tortures children for whom it's wrong for any parent. what's the logic of moral judgment? well, you come to that. this is what in aristotle we come to recognize that if it's wrong, actually wrong, wrong for...
1
1.0
Jul 31, 2023
07/23
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
on the pension court, the draft law , the non-governmental draft law, about antimonopoly legislation is not the government bill on the return of the declaration about which the government shouts so much non-governmental and we have a question about what this government does today was sent to the order in mr. tkachenko's free sailing, yes, the whole government should be sent free sailing because there are scumbags, scumbags, corruption and nothing to do with european integration and euro-atlantic integration, and using the opportunity, we welcome the fact that zelensky went to the nato summit today, but why didn't he visit the london summit, the madrid summit, this is a question for us. it is clear , but there is one thing, but still there is no clear list of requirements that our negotiators must agree with nato in order for ukraine to start official negotiations after the end of the war. and this is not lasted for years, and today we demand to support european solidarity amendments that meet the norms of the european union and the requirements of the venice commission and stop fooli
on the pension court, the draft law , the non-governmental draft law, about antimonopoly legislation is not the government bill on the return of the declaration about which the government shouts so much non-governmental and we have a question about what this government does today was sent to the order in mr. tkachenko's free sailing, yes, the whole government should be sent free sailing because there are scumbags, scumbags, corruption and nothing to do with european integration and...
144
144
Nov 17, 2011
11/11
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 144
favorite 0
quote 0
the nonuniformity of the laws regarding reciprocity makes it difficult for law-abiding permit holders to know for sure if they are obeying the law as they travel from state to state. while preserving the power of the states to set the rules on where concealed firearms can be carried, this bill will establish recognition in the 49 permit-issuing states. so this legislation will simply make it easier for law-abiding permit holders to know that they are simply in compliance with the law when they carry a firearm as they travel this wonderful country. drivers would have to stop at the state line to determine whether their license was valid before proceeding. each state would recognize some licenses but of course not all of them. some states would insist that others had precisely the same requirements for issues of a license before operating reciprocity. and the status of such reciprocity would be constantly changing literally day-to-day. so that is the reality of the current reciprocity agreements anding on the congress can remedy this -- and only the congress can remedy this interstate m
the nonuniformity of the laws regarding reciprocity makes it difficult for law-abiding permit holders to know for sure if they are obeying the law as they travel from state to state. while preserving the power of the states to set the rules on where concealed firearms can be carried, this bill will establish recognition in the 49 permit-issuing states. so this legislation will simply make it easier for law-abiding permit holders to know that they are simply in compliance with the law when they...
30
30
Oct 30, 2015
10/15
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 30
favorite 0
quote 0
international law? thank you. >> three great questions to close on. court one.criminal we had the reciprocity and deterrence one. and we have the implications of syria. we want to just go right down the panel and start with dave -- actually let's start with you ambassador. we will go down the panel and respond to each. syria,he question of that is a terrific question. it is also, if you look at syria on one hand and ukraine on the other, in the case of syria, the inner -- under international law, the u.s. government position -- in the absence of a security council authorization under chapter seven, and the absence of a basis of collective self-defense or consent of the government, there is not a basis for -- under international law for using military force their -- there, absent other circumstances. that is pretty well established. there are some significant limitations. i think that is a good example of how, notwithstanding those clear lines, the united states has found ways to the involved in trying t
international law? thank you. >> three great questions to close on. court one.criminal we had the reciprocity and deterrence one. and we have the implications of syria. we want to just go right down the panel and start with dave -- actually let's start with you ambassador. we will go down the panel and respond to each. syria,he question of that is a terrific question. it is also, if you look at syria on one hand and ukraine on the other, in the case of syria, the inner -- under...
1
1.0
Oct 19, 2023
10/23
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
enforcement has formal grounds to start working with it not as an idea, but as a draft law. the draft law and actually the current article, it covers actions, not any specific territories, that is, we are talking about the fact of committing collaborative activities. of course, the legislation does not have retroactive effect, we understand everything very well, that is why we actually followed the path of improving the current article, which is valid, well, from the middle of march 2022, that is, directly answering your direct direct question, well conditionally yes, write crimes that correspond to these articles, but were committed there, i don't know, in 2016-17 , they do not fall under the scope of this article, well , actually, this is the whole issue, with which i began my speech, which unfortunately , until february 24 , 2022, the ukrainian legislator did not pay enough attention to this phenomenon and this issue. and to clarify, there are generally some statistics, as it was then, that is, until the 24th , well, if it is not a crime, how can there be statistics, let
enforcement has formal grounds to start working with it not as an idea, but as a draft law. the draft law and actually the current article, it covers actions, not any specific territories, that is, we are talking about the fact of committing collaborative activities. of course, the legislation does not have retroactive effect, we understand everything very well, that is why we actually followed the path of improving the current article, which is valid, well, from the middle of march 2022, that...
31
31
Jan 28, 2018
01/18
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 31
favorite 0
quote 0
that was the impetus of this law. we need to get drugs only from our kids and we will ratchet up the penalties. the problem is that, as far as we can tell -- we asked several former and current prosecutors, looked at a lot of cases, and the people getting prosecuted for these laws are almost never actually dealing drugs to minors. there was a survey done by the massachusetts assistant attorney general in the 2000's. he looked at a year's worth of drug cases and found exactly one instance of a drug deal to a minor, and it occurred in an apartment at night, not actually at a school. so there are not actually a lot of drug dealers hanging out around schools. what these laws have actually done, our investigation found, is they tend to blanket whole areas in these drug-free school zones. they result in very long drug sentences for first-time offenders, and they do, indeed, have a disproportionate impact on minority communities, because these zones tend to cluster in low income minority neighborhoods because of the proximit
that was the impetus of this law. we need to get drugs only from our kids and we will ratchet up the penalties. the problem is that, as far as we can tell -- we asked several former and current prosecutors, looked at a lot of cases, and the people getting prosecuted for these laws are almost never actually dealing drugs to minors. there was a survey done by the massachusetts assistant attorney general in the 2000's. he looked at a year's worth of drug cases and found exactly one instance of a...
71
71
Sep 1, 2019
09/19
by
KNTV
tv
eye 71
favorite 0
quote 0
ohio got a d for its gun laws. california earned an a rating for its tougher regulations, even though when you add up the contributions from gun control groups, california only received $224,000, but that's still the most in the country. virginia ranks second with $189,000, but still earned a d rating for its lack of gun restrictions. new york is third at $120,000 and earned an a- for its gun laws. mattie: the influence of campaign contributions, really it's a wake up call for the american people. bigad: do you see this as some in congress putting money above lives? mattie: that's what the american people is looking at. sam: this issue is intense. we're gonna keep fighting. we believe what we do saves lives and that's why we're in it all the way to the end, and we think we're gonna win. bigad: and if money talks, the gun debate certainly seems to be heating up. congressional campaign contributions from gun rights groups shot up 20% last year, while groups advocating more gun control gave 1,000% more. we'll be right
ohio got a d for its gun laws. california earned an a rating for its tougher regulations, even though when you add up the contributions from gun control groups, california only received $224,000, but that's still the most in the country. virginia ranks second with $189,000, but still earned a d rating for its lack of gun restrictions. new york is third at $120,000 and earned an a- for its gun laws. mattie: the influence of campaign contributions, really it's a wake up call for the american...
44
44
Mar 29, 2017
03/17
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 44
favorite 0
quote 1
, the federal tax laws, the maritime laws, or the immigration laws. that is the job of the federal government. their well-known constitutional limits on the ability of the federal government to withhold fund to the states. state and local officials know their communities and how to keep them safe better than the federal government. the constitution's long-standing principles apparently are either ignored or seen as an impediment by some people. in the recent executive order on interior enforcement, president trump a polished the prior administrations and force of priorities to go after all 11 million undocumented immigrants in the united states, just as president trump promised he would do. and while this may satisfy most extreme elements in our country, it is not smart. it does not make our country safer. it does not make our country stronger. it has created a culture of fear. there are videos of parents taken from their u.s. citizen children by armed ice officers wearing the word "police" on their best. there are stories of mothers living in this co
, the federal tax laws, the maritime laws, or the immigration laws. that is the job of the federal government. their well-known constitutional limits on the ability of the federal government to withhold fund to the states. state and local officials know their communities and how to keep them safe better than the federal government. the constitution's long-standing principles apparently are either ignored or seen as an impediment by some people. in the recent executive order on interior...
177
177
Jun 26, 2012
06/12
by
MSNBC
tv
eye 177
favorite 0
quote 1
to enforce federal law. section 6 was ripped up and thrown away by the court because it empowered arizona cops to stop anyone they chose at any time to check their legal status in this country. people could be stopped without any legal provocation. just stopped, walking down the street, sitting in church, at the mall, going to school. stopped at any time, anywhere by local law enforcement agents and forced to prove their legal right to be in this country. that was the most shocking and most egregious part of the law and that part of the law is gone. but someone needs to tell that to harry reid's staff. the senate democratic leader issued a press release that says the supreme court decision, quote, gives arizona officials free rein to detain anyone they suspect of being in the state without documentation. as i said, that is one of the parts of the law that was thrown out. chuck schumer, who is the chairman of the senate subcommittee on immigration, who completely understands these issues, got it completely ri
to enforce federal law. section 6 was ripped up and thrown away by the court because it empowered arizona cops to stop anyone they chose at any time to check their legal status in this country. people could be stopped without any legal provocation. just stopped, walking down the street, sitting in church, at the mall, going to school. stopped at any time, anywhere by local law enforcement agents and forced to prove their legal right to be in this country. that was the most shocking and most...
72
72
Oct 7, 2018
10/18
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 72
favorite 0
quote 0
law. those of us who know about the modern practice of law recognize we are interconnect to if not by technology, but by the policies themselves. he gives me a great deal of pleasure to recognize the fact that our law school stands as one of the one that is really champion international law in a very big way. this particular lecture in particular gives us an opportunity to really explain to the general public white intellectual law matters, why it matters and domestic policy and why we need to learn as much as they can about it in order to make sure democracy functions very well. today's speaker knows that intimate lame and i've got to say a 10 a big admirer for a very long time. he spent an appointee at the state department. the thing that distinguishes our speaker today is not his intellect, not only his service to his academy which has been great, but his willingness to exemplify what i have lectured about all of the world and not his lawyers always seek ways to enrich societies in whic
law. those of us who know about the modern practice of law recognize we are interconnect to if not by technology, but by the policies themselves. he gives me a great deal of pleasure to recognize the fact that our law school stands as one of the one that is really champion international law in a very big way. this particular lecture in particular gives us an opportunity to really explain to the general public white intellectual law matters, why it matters and domestic policy and why we need to...
94
94
Oct 26, 2013
10/13
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 94
favorite 0
quote 0
law, there is no obligation to obey such a law, of augusta,he words it is no law at all. now, story was in agreement with dr. king's description of the relationship between natural and positive law, and uses the to le of marriage illustrate his view. he says that marriage arises from the law of nature because it channels otherwise dangerous sexual appetites toward the mute twal good of the spouses, and the responsible co-creation and rearing of children. in -- from these premsiss story concludes, if marriage be a part of the natural law derived from nature, then whatever has a natural tendency to destroy it or discourage its value is by the same law prohibited. in other words, story believed that positive law must conform o natural law. remarkably for justice joseph story, positive law that conflicts with natural law is ot law at all. having examined story's philosophical statement, let us see how he applied his view. case, an admiralty american public armed vessel seized an allegedly french ship suspected of engaging in the trafficking of slaves. the american captain saw
law, there is no obligation to obey such a law, of augusta,he words it is no law at all. now, story was in agreement with dr. king's description of the relationship between natural and positive law, and uses the to le of marriage illustrate his view. he says that marriage arises from the law of nature because it channels otherwise dangerous sexual appetites toward the mute twal good of the spouses, and the responsible co-creation and rearing of children. in -- from these premsiss story...
112
112
Apr 29, 2012
04/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 112
favorite 0
quote 0
state's sodomy laws. that process proceeded through legislature and state courts for a period of four decades -- more than four decades. at the same time, some states held onto the laws, and others like texas, got rid of all of their archaic laws and kept the sodomy law and narrowed it and specified it so that it applied only to -- deviant sexual intercourse, as it was called in texas -- only applied to homosexuals debtsmac. at the same time texas did that in 1973, narrowing the definition of just targeting gay people. it decriminalized things like adultery, which had been criminal in texas before. it decriminalized and the law that was called seduction on promise of marriage. the couple of others. and it decriminalized bestiality. as of 1973 in texas, you could legally have vexed with another species, but not with another person you were committed to and in love with if they were of the same sex. that was a remarkable maxim which that texas was sending. i have never heard of a traditional morality which
state's sodomy laws. that process proceeded through legislature and state courts for a period of four decades -- more than four decades. at the same time, some states held onto the laws, and others like texas, got rid of all of their archaic laws and kept the sodomy law and narrowed it and specified it so that it applied only to -- deviant sexual intercourse, as it was called in texas -- only applied to homosexuals debtsmac. at the same time texas did that in 1973, narrowing the definition of...
0
0.0
Jan 19, 2024
01/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
, time is not on the side of law enforcement. every second counts. the priority of law enforcement must be to immediately enter the room and stop the shooter with whatever weapons and tools officers have with them. $>that's the approach responding officers first employed when they arrived at robb elementary school. but within minutes of arriving inside the school, oicials on scene transition from treating the scene as an active shooter situation to treating the shooter as a barricaded subject. this was the most significant failure. that failure meant that law enforcement officials prioritized a protracted evacuation of students and teachers in other classrooms inead of immediately rescuing the victims trapped with the active shooter. it meant that officials spent trying -- time trying to negotiate instead of entering the room and confronting him. it meant that officials asked for and waited for additional responders and instead of following executive -- excepted practice in moving towards the shooter with threso. it meant waiting
, time is not on the side of law enforcement. every second counts. the priority of law enforcement must be to immediately enter the room and stop the shooter with whatever weapons and tools officers have with them. $>that's the approach responding officers first employed when they arrived at robb elementary school. but within minutes of arriving inside the school, oicials on scene transition from treating the scene as an active shooter situation to treating the shooter as a barricaded...
0
0.0
Aug 17, 2022
08/22
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
turning it into a positive, bridging the gap between law -- between the law enforcement community at the state, local, or even federal level. the men and women i represent are doing a phenomenal job in assisting state and local partners bridging that gap. and that's what's important with faith & blue. and partnering with the reverend, you are doing an outstanding job with your team, and i'm happy and proud to be a part of that with my team, because we know that that is beneficial not only to the communities that we serve, but also beneficial to the people we represent, because it makes them much safer. it gives them the ability to know the communities they serve, the communities they patrol, the communities they are helping protect from violent crime in america. and that is an important message to send to the men and women we lead, that we have your backs. 100% of the general public is behind you. although there may be that 1% out there that turns around and tells you, the law enforcement guys are the bad guys, but that's not true, because when you need help, you called 911 -- when y
turning it into a positive, bridging the gap between law -- between the law enforcement community at the state, local, or even federal level. the men and women i represent are doing a phenomenal job in assisting state and local partners bridging that gap. and that's what's important with faith & blue. and partnering with the reverend, you are doing an outstanding job with your team, and i'm happy and proud to be a part of that with my team, because we know that that is beneficial not only...
0
0.0
Dec 26, 2023
12/23
by
IRINN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the law . the head of the federation has the highest rank. do you know where our problem is, i am from here hazrat ayatollah, please don't let your dear judges and the judiciary tell the federations about all these sports of our education. at least we can talk more easily. the law you attached is wrong. have the courage to tell me , did the supreme leader serve his highness in the meeting we had ? the examples of corruption are in the contracts. under the rain , the khuzestan spectators who go sit under the heat of 55 degrees, why should four points be given to a team, why even if esteghlal has made a mistake, take the mistake away from him. you are no longer greater than the position of the supreme leader in this country, if you accept the mistakes you made, the disciplinary committee made a mistake , kick you out, it made a mistake and did not punish him. written by a. warning, second, applause, third, so-and-so. where did it say, where in that law did it say 40 billion tomans , why didn't it
the law . the head of the federation has the highest rank. do you know where our problem is, i am from here hazrat ayatollah, please don't let your dear judges and the judiciary tell the federations about all these sports of our education. at least we can talk more easily. the law you attached is wrong. have the courage to tell me , did the supreme leader serve his highness in the meeting we had ? the examples of corruption are in the contracts. under the rain , the khuzestan spectators who go...
29
29
Nov 18, 2017
11/17
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 29
favorite 0
quote 0
law. judicial activism is especially disturbing and our country. because we have inherited and advanced the most magnificent legal system in the history of the world. indeed, the american system is one of the greatest achievements in civilization. we have the oldest existing constitution in the world. it is an achievement we have been blessed to inherit and that we have been able to advance. so many have you helped advance it. it is one of the main reasons that america is exceptional. history teaches us that such a system of ours, such a legal order as ours is precious, it is rare. i have traveled the world. i have seen how hard it is to pass out a constitution to an undeveloped country and expect them to be able to carry it out. it is fragile. civilization is difficult to build, but sometimes easy to destroy. as i see him address, abraham lincoln said if we accept the small violations of the rule of law, then these violations will only become more frequent and more serious and if that hap
law. judicial activism is especially disturbing and our country. because we have inherited and advanced the most magnificent legal system in the history of the world. indeed, the american system is one of the greatest achievements in civilization. we have the oldest existing constitution in the world. it is an achievement we have been blessed to inherit and that we have been able to advance. so many have you helped advance it. it is one of the main reasons that america is exceptional. history...
52
52
Apr 3, 2018
04/18
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 52
favorite 0
quote 0
i got involved through the yellow law school test the yale law school -- the yale law school. and it seemed at the time it is difficult to find a witness. a married woman whose husband did not object and could stand up and give evidence. i was examined in given further advice. >> we had gone directly to the clinic and the police station. >> yes, i did go to the clinic and see dr. buckson. we accepted advice, but did not actually use it. the police sent us a way to come back tomorrow and say that this had also been used. >> there's another aspect, even though the folks in connecticut were planning for this, did not pounce on. again, this news report about a neighbor who got involved and we will learn about his role in setting the wheels in motion. >> i'm 100% against birth control because it is immoral. it is the same as prostitution, abortion or any of those other immoral things. >> when rock 'n roll came to new haven, the mayor of new haven them out of town. everybody in this part of mississippi was thrown out of town because he was against hurting children. when birth contro
i got involved through the yellow law school test the yale law school -- the yale law school. and it seemed at the time it is difficult to find a witness. a married woman whose husband did not object and could stand up and give evidence. i was examined in given further advice. >> we had gone directly to the clinic and the police station. >> yes, i did go to the clinic and see dr. buckson. we accepted advice, but did not actually use it. the police sent us a way to come back tomorrow...
6
6.0
Jun 5, 2020
06/20
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 6
favorite 0
quote 0
the laws. in october of 2019, the president established the first commission on law enforcement since the 1960's, and i am meeting with them later this month and i've been talking with law enforcement leaders around the country. in the weeks and months ahead, we will be working with community leaders to find constructive solutions so that mr. floyd's death will not have been in vain. we will work hard to bring good out of bad. unfortunately, the aftermath of george floyd's death has produced a second challenge to the rule of law. while many have peacefully expressed their anger and grief, others have hijacked protests to engage in lawlessness, violent rioting, arson, looting of businesses, and public property, assaults on law enforcement officers and innocent people, and even the murder of a federal agent. -- such senseless acts of anarchy are not exercises of first amendment rights. they are crimes designed to terrify fellow citizens and intimidate communities. as i told the governors on monda
the laws. in october of 2019, the president established the first commission on law enforcement since the 1960's, and i am meeting with them later this month and i've been talking with law enforcement leaders around the country. in the weeks and months ahead, we will be working with community leaders to find constructive solutions so that mr. floyd's death will not have been in vain. we will work hard to bring good out of bad. unfortunately, the aftermath of george floyd's death has produced a...
3
3.0
Apr 6, 2022
04/22
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 3
favorite 0
quote 0
the law. .. our responsibilities under the constitution. and while that certainly a simplification of each of the three branches, it does illustrate that there are separate lanes or roles for each branch in our constitutional branch in our constitutional for each branch in our constitutional republic. and we talked about that during judge jackson's confirmation hearing. the judge says she understands the importance of staying in her lane. she used that phrase many times during the confirmation hearing. she said she would not try to do congress' job, making laws, but over the years, and i think this is a blind spot for judge jackson and, frankly, many on the bench, particularly at the highest levels, over the years we've come to see a pattern of judges who embrace the concept of judge made law. in other words, it's not derived from a statute passed by the congress. it's not derived from the text of the constitution itself, but rather it's made as a policy judgment without any explicit reference in
the law. .. our responsibilities under the constitution. and while that certainly a simplification of each of the three branches, it does illustrate that there are separate lanes or roles for each branch in our constitutional branch in our constitutional for each branch in our constitutional republic. and we talked about that during judge jackson's confirmation hearing. the judge says she understands the importance of staying in her lane. she used that phrase many times during the confirmation...
0
0.0
Jun 23, 2022
06/22
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the law in federal enclaves is exclusive federal law. it's a bizarre thing that congress would have of dont it, to say we are going to have federal enclaves law apply and then we are also going to have state law applying? this is not like federal and state law apply in the statement new york or something, right, because federal enclaves law is essentially law the duplicates of the kind of subjects in which state law is concerned. you have two bodies of general law operating in the same geographic area. now that now and that then is kind of odd. like, why would we think that that's what congress did when it said in the statute book to federal enclaves? >> i don't think that's odd, justice kagan, either as a matter of text or as a matter of history. so as to the text our fundamental submission here is that when you look at the structure of that sentence in section 1152 it provides that the general laws of the united states as to the punishment of offenses committed within federal enclaves shall extend to the indian country. and i think tha
the law in federal enclaves is exclusive federal law. it's a bizarre thing that congress would have of dont it, to say we are going to have federal enclaves law apply and then we are also going to have state law applying? this is not like federal and state law apply in the statement new york or something, right, because federal enclaves law is essentially law the duplicates of the kind of subjects in which state law is concerned. you have two bodies of general law operating in the same...
2
2.0
Sep 28, 2023
09/23
by
IRINN
tv
eye 2
favorite 0
quote 0
, heavy vehicles are also considered in another law of ours, in fact, the law of making one cloth as one cloth, and it is national information that different devices keep their information scattered . a centralized place where users can now go there refer and use this capacity and it did not exist. this law is one of the practical laws that have been implemented and it will definitely make the business environment much better than before. the use of this capacity actually provides a compilation of information that can be used by all groups. the law of the system of the automobile industry. the automobile industry in our country is as you expect. it is an industry that does not respond to the needs of the people, which means that it does not have the satisfaction of the people. for years , there has been a trend of the government's confusion. regardless of the actual negative effects of this removal of installations and these interferences, this law actually regulates the import of cars to satisfy the people, which is really the demand of the people. even the second-hand cars have bee
, heavy vehicles are also considered in another law of ours, in fact, the law of making one cloth as one cloth, and it is national information that different devices keep their information scattered . a centralized place where users can now go there refer and use this capacity and it did not exist. this law is one of the practical laws that have been implemented and it will definitely make the business environment much better than before. the use of this capacity actually provides a compilation...
1
1.0
Nov 23, 2023
11/23
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
finally, the vacation law. believe me, there were so many thanks from the military for this law, which yes, thank god, they managed to persuade you, it was voted on, you didn't, it's incredible, they saw each other, they came back home, it is very necessary, but there is a very important next issue, this is the issue of replacement, replacement of those who are on the front lines today, the issue of demobilization, there is no need to be afraid of this issue, there are hundreds of thousands of people. who then in february, march, april last year, saved the country, they went as volunteers, or were mobilized, but did not hide anywhere, supported the country and saved it, today they need our support, because it cannot be the case that the entry into the armed forces are there, but there is no way out, people have the right to know the term of service, so that sooner or later they understood, when they will return home, in the verkhovna rada there is my bill to give the right to demobilization for 17 months, today
finally, the vacation law. believe me, there were so many thanks from the military for this law, which yes, thank god, they managed to persuade you, it was voted on, you didn't, it's incredible, they saw each other, they came back home, it is very necessary, but there is a very important next issue, this is the issue of replacement, replacement of those who are on the front lines today, the issue of demobilization, there is no need to be afraid of this issue, there are hundreds of thousands of...
177
177
May 1, 2010
05/10
by
FOXNEWS
tv
eye 177
favorite 0
quote 0
law enforcement as does -- because all this law does is act as a force multiplier to enforce laws that are already on the books. there is plenty of precedent supporting what arizona has done. three of its laws to try and enforce illegal immigration have all been upheld. most recently the ninth circuit in 2008 upheld an arizona law to prohibit employers from knowingly hiring illegal aliens. all the bill does is take existing federal law, requiring aliens who are in the country legally to carry their immigration documents and makes that a state -- state requirement as well. the other factors of the law are perfectly consistent with police activity. >> juan: hold on a second, i want you to come into it too. the fact is, many of the credit takes say there is something called a supremacy clause. the federal government controls immigration of the united states. it's not a matter of state option. as to how they enforce or don't enforce the law. is that right or wrong? >> you know, juan, let's be honest, the law of preemption is incredibly murky. i have no doubt there are courts that could rul
law enforcement as does -- because all this law does is act as a force multiplier to enforce laws that are already on the books. there is plenty of precedent supporting what arizona has done. three of its laws to try and enforce illegal immigration have all been upheld. most recently the ninth circuit in 2008 upheld an arizona law to prohibit employers from knowingly hiring illegal aliens. all the bill does is take existing federal law, requiring aliens who are in the country legally to carry...
139
139
Jun 28, 2010
06/10
by
WMPT
tv
eye 139
favorite 0
quote 0
law." put the rest of my statement in the record. and senator sessions. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i would like to join you in recognizing a special moment with the loss of senator byrd who was such an institution here. he taught all of the new senators something about the senate. he believed there were two great senates -- the roman senate and the american senate and he wanted ours to be the greatest ever. i remember one day he gave a speech on a friday morning which i heard in which he complained about textbooks and their failure to distinguish between a republic and a democracy. he went on at some length demonstrating that and then called them touchy, feely twaddle, but he loved the constitution, he loved our country and he loved clarity of thought and we will certainly miss him. ms. kagan, let me join chairman lehe in welcoming you today, this nomination is a proud day for you and your fans and rightfully so. i enjoyed very much our meeting a few weeks ago and appreciated the chance to
law." put the rest of my statement in the record. and senator sessions. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i would like to join you in recognizing a special moment with the loss of senator byrd who was such an institution here. he taught all of the new senators something about the senate. he believed there were two great senates -- the roman senate and the american senate and he wanted ours to be the greatest ever. i remember one day he gave a speech on a friday morning which i heard in...
0
0.0
Mar 16, 2023
03/23
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
eric ruben assistant professor of law cool of law. his scholarship focuses on exploring the regulation of violence and weapons and how that regulation intersects with self-defense and second amendment. raphael commented i pronounce it right good, is the fellow and head of research for police and public safety initiative of the manhattan institute for policy research where he writes on topics relating to police, crime, incarceration among others. as a project manager for combating crimes guns initiative at brady. before joining brady he served in the national police department in san diego county and the california department of justice. he has 27 years of law enforcement experience. i thank all of the witnesses for being here today. each senator will have five minutes after you five minutes for opening statement. each of the witnesses please stand at moment to be sworn in? >> raise your right hand. you affirm the testimony about too go before the committee be the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help you god? at the
eric ruben assistant professor of law cool of law. his scholarship focuses on exploring the regulation of violence and weapons and how that regulation intersects with self-defense and second amendment. raphael commented i pronounce it right good, is the fellow and head of research for police and public safety initiative of the manhattan institute for policy research where he writes on topics relating to police, crime, incarceration among others. as a project manager for combating crimes guns...
37
37
Oct 16, 2014
10/14
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 37
favorite 0
quote 0
should be beyond the law. there should be no law free zones in this country. i believe we need to follow the letter of the law to examine the contents of someone's closet or the contents of their cell phone. the notion that the marketplace could create something that would prevent the closet from even when opened, they properly obtained a court order, makes a sense. i think it is time to ask, where are we as a society? are we no longer a country that is passionate both about the rule of law and about there being no sense in this country beyond the reach of that rule of law? have we become so distrustful of government and law enforcement in particular that that we are willing to let bad guys walk away? i know there will come a day where it will matter a great deal to innocent people that we in law enforcement cannot access certain types of data or information even with court authority. we have to have discussions about this. i believe people should be skeptical of government power. i am. i think this country wa
should be beyond the law. there should be no law free zones in this country. i believe we need to follow the letter of the law to examine the contents of someone's closet or the contents of their cell phone. the notion that the marketplace could create something that would prevent the closet from even when opened, they properly obtained a court order, makes a sense. i think it is time to ask, where are we as a society? are we no longer a country that is passionate both about the rule of law and...
145
145
May 9, 2010
05/10
by
FOXNEWS
tv
eye 145
favorite 0
quote 0
laws, nothing. they come to under the radar when it comes to the taking advantage of the social services. at the end of the day, someone with a less interest is a nuisance. once they're a nuisance, they don't benefit society as a whole. >> glenn: george in the middle of the second row and then we'll taking a break. >> illegal versus legal. everybody here, including myself, are for immigration, but for legal immigration. if you are going to break down law, are you going to break every other law? we are a country of laws. that's why we're a great country. >> glenn: i'm going to take a break and then we'll start think. want to go over this. i think this is relatively easy to fix but i'm alone in that i think. i want to go over my plan and see what you think. see what you think. i can solve difficult problems for a fortune 500 company. i can run a successful business. i can put my military experience to work for your company. i can manage your home improvements. i can publicize your message. i can teach
laws, nothing. they come to under the radar when it comes to the taking advantage of the social services. at the end of the day, someone with a less interest is a nuisance. once they're a nuisance, they don't benefit society as a whole. >> glenn: george in the middle of the second row and then we'll taking a break. >> illegal versus legal. everybody here, including myself, are for immigration, but for legal immigration. if you are going to break down law, are you going to break...
179
179
Jul 18, 2010
07/10
by
WJZ
tv
eye 179
favorite 0
quote 0
when you enforce the law, people obey the law. for example, the arizona republic, an open borders newspaper carried an article featuring the governor of sonora our neighboring mexican state. the governor of sonora was complaining that so many of his citizens were returning home. why are they returning home? because the county sheriff joe arpaio who has endorsed me was enforcing immigration law. when you enforce the law, people obey the law. now the left using this false argument of ethnicity wants to try and eradicate the law. >> schieffer: i need to go back to mr. richardson. governor richardson, i've put the question to the attorney general last week. just what his critics have been saying that the reason the administration filed this law was they were simply trying to find a way to brand republicans as anti-immigration and even worse anti-hispanic. he said no that's not the case. what is your response to that? >> well, look, bob, if we're going to resolve this problem it's got to be bipartisan. i'm going to give credit to presi
when you enforce the law, people obey the law. for example, the arizona republic, an open borders newspaper carried an article featuring the governor of sonora our neighboring mexican state. the governor of sonora was complaining that so many of his citizens were returning home. why are they returning home? because the county sheriff joe arpaio who has endorsed me was enforcing immigration law. when you enforce the law, people obey the law. now the left using this false argument of ethnicity...
60
60
Nov 20, 2016
11/16
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 60
favorite 0
quote 0
a federal law outlaws hiring a member of the family, it includes a son-in-law. he says no federal official can do it. donald trump is deciding to test it, daring the media to take a stand. let me get this straight. i believe letting a big man ignore the law, in fact, the spirit of the law, you send him the worst possible signal. you tell him he's above the law. if you say this isn't a big deal hiring your son-in-law to sit with you in the oval office, tell me when you plan to say no to donald trump. tell me now because believe me, this is just the first stip, the first taste of what it's going to be like, and remember the mentality that gave us the worst constitutional crisis of all time, in the words of nixon, when the president does it, that means it's not illegal. we stand now at the bridge connecting what donald trump wants to do and what the constitution, the law, the media, and the american people will let him get away with. what we do will decide what this moment in history will look like in american history. as evidenced so far, this is part of a larger
a federal law outlaws hiring a member of the family, it includes a son-in-law. he says no federal official can do it. donald trump is deciding to test it, daring the media to take a stand. let me get this straight. i believe letting a big man ignore the law, in fact, the spirit of the law, you send him the worst possible signal. you tell him he's above the law. if you say this isn't a big deal hiring your son-in-law to sit with you in the oval office, tell me when you plan to say no to donald...
1
1.0
Jul 31, 2023
07/23
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
moreover, arbitrary when uh, this law is interpreted. well, when black says white, and then really, as colleagues say, cases fall apart in the courts, so we are for, as the previous speaking authors said , for us to approach honestly and fairly to this law and between the first and second readings , they were able to bring it into line so that indeed politicians were accountable, politicians were transparent, politicians were declared, but that this declaration was reasonable and understandable for society and did not allow anyone to speculate or manipulate
moreover, arbitrary when uh, this law is interpreted. well, when black says white, and then really, as colleagues say, cases fall apart in the courts, so we are for, as the previous speaking authors said , for us to approach honestly and fairly to this law and between the first and second readings , they were able to bring it into line so that indeed politicians were accountable, politicians were transparent, politicians were declared, but that this declaration was reasonable and understandable...